Internal documents from Meta revealed during California lawsuits show the company knew Instagram was designed to be addictive and deliberately hid this from parents. "oh my gosh yall IG is a drug," a Meta user experience researcher wrote to colleagues. "We're basically pushers… We are causing Reward Deficit Disorder bc people are binging on IG so much they can't feel reward anymore." The researcher concluded that users' addiction was "biological and psychological" and that management was exploiting it. "The top down directives drive it all towards making sure people keep coming back for more."
A 2016 email from Mark Zuckerberg about Facebook's live videos feature stated "we'll need to be very good about not notifying parents / teachers" about teens' videos. "If we tell teens' parents about their live videos, that will probably ruin the product from the start." Meta's internal research found that 55% of Facebook users had "mild" problematic use of the platform, while 3.1% had "severe" problems. Zuckerberg noted that 3% of billions would still be millions of people. The company published research claiming only that "we estimate (as an upper bound) that 3.1% of Facebook users in the US experience problematic use," omitting the 55% figure entirely.
YouTube internal discussions showed that accounts from minors violating YouTube policies were active on the platform for an average of 938 days before detection, giving underage users years to create content and expose themselves to risk. Two California lawsuits consolidating complaints from hundreds of school districts and state attorneys general allege that social media companies knew about risks to children and teens but pushed ahead with marketing their products anyway. The suits target Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Snap. TikTok and Snap settled this week for undisclosed amounts. Meta and Google continue as defendants.
The lawsuits bypass Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act by targeting the design and marketing of platforms rather than content itself. The federal case faces a dismissal hearing with a decision expected in weeks. Trial is set for June. The state case entered jury selection this week with Zuckerberg expected to testify.
Social media companies hired psychologists and neuroscientists to exploit vulnerability patterns in human brains. Intermittent variable rewards trigger dopamine release the same way slot machines do. You scroll, occasionally get something interesting, so you keep scrolling. The unpredictability makes it more addictive than consistent rewards. Notifications interrupt whatever you're doing and pull you back to the app. Every like, comment, share, and mention creates a dopamine hit that conditions you to check constantly. The red badge notification icon was designed to be anxiety-inducing so you'd feel compelled to clear it.
Infinite scroll removes natural stopping points. Early versions of these platforms had pagination. Companies removed it because endless feeds increased engagement time. Algorithmic feeds prioritize content that provokes strong emotional reactions because that drives engagement. Outrage, fear, and anger keep people commenting and sharing more than positive content. The algorithms learned this and now actively promote divisive and emotionally manipulative content because it's profitable.
Everyone posts highlights and curated versions of their lives. Users compare their reality to everyone else's highlight reel and feel inadequate. Studies show increased social media use correlates with higher rates of depression, anxiety, and loneliness across all age groups. Platforms track how long you look at each post, what you click, what you scroll past, who you interact with, what time of day you're most active. They use this data to customize your feed to be maximally addictive to you specifically. The algorithm learns your psychological vulnerabilities and exploits them.
The average person checks their phone 96 times per day. Social media apps fragment your attention span. You can't focus on complex tasks for extended periods because your brain has been trained to expect constant novelty and stimulation. Blue light from screens suppresses melatonin production. The psychological stimulation from social media content keeps your brain activated when it should be winding down. Checking your phone before bed destroys sleep quality for millions of people.
Parasocial relationships with influencers and content creators replace real social connections. People spend hours watching strangers' lives while their actual relationships atrophy. The platforms profit from this because parasocial relationships drive more consistent engagement than real friendships. Political polarization has accelerated because social media algorithms promote extreme content and create filter bubbles. You see content that confirms your existing beliefs and makes you angry about the other side. Moderate, nuanced content doesn't drive clicks.
The platforms know all of this. Internal research at Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok has documented these harms for years. They chose profit over user wellbeing at every decision point. Meta published research claiming social media had minimal negative effects while sitting on internal studies showing the opposite. YouTube knew its recommendation algorithm was radicalizing users and kept it running because it increased watch time. TikTok's algorithm is so effective at addiction that the Chinese version, Douyin, has built-in time limits and educational content requirements that the international version doesn't have.
Deleting social media apps improves mental health outcomes in every study that's measured it. Attention span improves. Sleep quality improves. Anxiety and depression symptoms decrease. Real-world social connections strengthen. Every feature exists to increase engagement metrics. Nothing exists to protect your wellbeing unless legally required.
The lawsuits in California are exposing the deliberate harm these companies cause. The internal documents show executives discussing how addictive their products are, how much damage they cause, and how to hide this information from users and regulators. Social media companies will claim they're just providing a service people want. They'll point to features they added after backlash like screen time trackers and content warnings. The engagement optimization algorithms are still running. The psychological exploitation mechanisms are still active. If you're using these platforms, you're the product being sold to advertisers. Your attention is the commodity. Your psychological vulnerabilities are the exploit being leveraged for profit.
Blackout VPN exists because privacy is a right. Your first name is too much information for us.
Keep learning
FAQ
What did Meta's internal documents reveal?
Meta employees called Instagram a drug and said they were causing Reward Deficit Disorder. Internal research found 55% of users had problematic use, but Meta published only the 3.1% severe figure. Zuckerberg said telling parents about teens' live videos would ruin the product.
What are the California lawsuits about?
Hundreds of school districts and state attorneys general are suing Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Snap for knowingly marketing addictive products to children. The suits bypass Section 230 by targeting design and marketing rather than content. Trial is set for June.
How do social media platforms create addiction?
Companies hired psychologists to exploit brain vulnerabilities using intermittent variable rewards like slot machines, anxiety-inducing notifications, infinite scroll, and algorithms that prioritize emotional reactions. Platforms track your behavior to customize feeds that exploit your specific psychological weaknesses.
Does deleting social media actually help?
Every study measuring it shows deleting social media apps improves mental health outcomes. Attention span improves, sleep quality improves, anxiety and depression symptoms decrease, and real-world social connections strengthen.
Why is TikTok's Chinese version different?
Douyin, TikTok's Chinese version, has built-in time limits and educational content requirements that the international version doesn't have. TikTok's algorithm is so effective at addiction that China regulates it domestically while exporting the unregulated version globally.